Sam Rolley
There has been a great deal of
Internet chatter in recent months about the massive difference between Senator
Barack Obama and President Barack Obama. In light of the National Security
Agency Spying revelations and what appears to be a looming military engagement
in Syria, a 2007 Boston Globe interview with Senator Obama is
a paramount example of how the President has changed— or, perhaps, of how he
lied his way into the White House.
Here are a few key Obama
statements from the interview:
§ The
Supreme Court has never held that the president has such powers. As president,
I will follow existing law, and when it comes to U.S. citizens and residents, I
will only authorize surveillance for national security purposes consistent with
FISA and other federal statutes.
§ The
President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize
a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or
imminent threat to the nation.
§ As
Commander-in-Chief, the President does have a duty to protect and defend the
United States. In instances of self-defense, the President would be within his
constitutional authority to act before advising Congress or seeking its
consent.
§ Warrantless
surveillance of American citizens, in defiance of FISA, is unlawful and
unconstitutional.
§ I
believe the [Bush] Administration’s use of executive authority to over-classify
information is a bad idea. We need to restore the balance between the
necessarily secret and the necessity of openness in our democracy – which is
why I have called for a National Declassification Center.
§ Any
President takes an oath to, “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of
the United States.” The American people need to know where we stand on these
issues before they entrust us with this responsibility – particularly at a time
when our laws, our traditions, and our Constitution have been repeatedly
challenged by this [the Bush] Administration.
Read the full interview here.
Little did Obama voters know
that what the President really meant to say during his initial campaign was: “I hope no
one notices how I change after I sucker them into voting me
into office with empty promises about upholding the Constitution.”
H/T: Weasel Zippers
Sam Rolley, PersonalLiberty Digest, Aug. 27, 2013
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-