Ian Bremmer
The Brazen murder of Russian opposition figure
Boris Nemtsov [photo] is the latest confirmation that the relationship between the West
and Russia is irretrievably broken–and will remain so as long as Vladimir Putin
is in power.
I knew Boris very well. He was brash and
good-natured, always speaking his mind. He believed in the Russian people, with
a hunger for real democracy and a free market. I agreed. So when Putin took
power in 2000, we were torn.
On the one hand, it was clear that Putin was no
democrat. But could you blame him? Mikhail Gorbachev’s combination of political
and economic liberalization helped precipitate the Soviet collapse. Putin
wasn’t going to repeat that failed experiment. But neither did he seem intent
on restoring the Soviet empire. As a little-known outsider, Putin wasn’t
stained by the shortcomings and corruption of the Russian political class.
Boris and I believed that if you improved the
Russian economy enough, it would ultimately pave the way for real reform on the
political side. We thought Putin had the best chance to make that happen. In
January 2000, Boris and I wrote a joint op-ed for the New York Times, dubbing
Putin “Russia’s best bet.” Given his “commitment to the national interest,” we
argued, “it is difficult to see how to do better.”
Over the decade to come, the Russian economy
rebounded, enriching a broad swath of the population (and a handful of
oligarchs at the top, who reaped staggering rewards). In 1999, per capita
income was $1,300. Today, it’s $14,600.
So what went wrong? Just about everything else.
Some of the mistakes were Washington’s. There
was a legitimate perception in Russia that the U.S. didn’t care about Russian
preferences and core principles. But the fundamental failures came from within
Russia. Our hope that economic strength could lead to political reform wasn’t
meant to be. The economy may have surged, but without underlying resilience and
diversification. Economic growth was a one-trick pony, driven by revenue from
high oil and gas prices. In 1999, oil and gas accounted for less than half of
Russia’s export revenue. By 2013, it was more than two-thirds.
That same lack of diversification stymied
political change. Putin used the economic windfall and the popularity that came
with it to hollow out political institutions and silence competing voices,
consolidating power under one-man rule. He squeezed out any room for political
plurality, leaving alternative levers of power brittle and irrelevant. He cast
supporters of the West as dangerous enemies of the state. That’s why figures
like Garry Kasparov fled the country.
Boris Nemtsov stayed. Was it bravery? Not
exactly. Call it hopefulness and an inability to stop himself: he was a
restless man of emotional impulse. In recent months, he was looking into
evidence of Russian troops in Ukraine and was about to release a scathing
report.
Do I think Putin had him killed? No. The murder
is embarrassing for Putin and actually reveals weakness rather than strength.
In recent months, Putin has used a different tactic, releasing from prison
dissident Mikhail Khodorkovsky and members of Pussy Riot. He wanted to reflect
the magnanimity that comes with absolute power. Nemtsov’s murder projects the
opposite.
Yet on many levels, Putin is to blame. He
created a system in which the murder of a major opposition figure became
thinkable. Boris’ killing is the most dramatic indication that the Kremlin
strategy of boosting its political power by demonizing the West and Western
sympathizers is working. Putin can’t back down, and things will only worsen.
Boris’ death confirms just how misplaced our
bet on Putin was. We’ll miss you, Boris Efimovich.
Ian Bremmer, TIME, March 16, 2015
Foreign-affairs columnist Bremmer is the president
of Eurasia Group, a political-risk consultancy.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-