![]() |
A car burns amid debris after rockets shelled the city of Mariupol, Ukraine, on Jan. 24. (Image from Reuters video) |
Analysis
Reports of heavy rocket
artillery firing on the eastern parts of the city of Mariupol, Ukraine, as well
as a statement made by a separatist leader, indicate the potential preparation
of an offensive on the city. While this would be a significant escalation and
an indicator of Russian intent to push further into Ukraine, potentially
forming a much-rumored land connection to the northern border of Crimea, there
are also several indicators required for such an offensive that are currently
still missing.
Reports of heavy rocket
artillery firing on the eastern parts of the city of Mariupol have been widely
reported, with the death toll rising to 27 people. Mariupol has been shelled in
the past, notably in early September, but as the cease-fire took
affect separatist forces generally conducted attacks only outside of the city.
It is not clear whether this is simply an intensification of relatively static
fighting along the front between Russian and pro-Russian forces on the one
side, and Ukrainians, or the beginning of a Russian-led offensive to widen the
pocket, or the opening move in a broader strategic offensive to link up with
Crimea, 200 miles to the west of the pocket.
The widespread use of Grad
Multiple Launch Rocket Systems indicates that this is a planned action with
significant logistical support that it involves extensive use of Russian
troops, though Grad fire has been widely used throughout the conflict. There
have been indications that Russian forces, including Russian Marines, have
moved into the eastern Ukraine pocket controlled by pro-Russian forces, giving
the Russians offensive options. Heavy artillery preparations frequently precede
Russian attacks, particularly by concentrated MLRS attack. Given the amount of
munitions needed to supply concentrated fire, the Russians tend not to use them
casually. The presence of Grad missiles indicates the possibility of artillery
preparation for a broader offensive.
The attack comes days after
the Russian forces secured the Donetsk Airport, important in defending the right flank of any offensive westward.
It also comes days after Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges, commander of U.S. Army forces in
Europe, came to Ukraine and publicly announced that a small number of U.S. Army
trainers would be arriving in Ukraine. While any large-scale offensive would
have been considered and planned for much longer, the decision of the United
States to send Lt. Gen. Hodges could have affected the dynamic of internal
Russian calculations.
In any event, we do not yet
know Russia’s strategic intentions. This could simply be an attempt to signal
the danger Russia could pose to their negotiating partners in the west. It
could be an attempt to extend the pocket they hold modestly. It could, finally,
be the opening of an offensive toward Crimea.
The Russian position in Crimea
is untenable. Crimea is easily isolated should Ukranian forces strengthen or
Western forces get involved. Russia holds Crimea only to the extent that the
West chooses not to intervene, or to the extent that it extends a relatively
wide and robustly defended land bridge from Russia to the Crimea. Crimea and
the Sevastapol naval facilities are of strategic importance to Russia and the
decision to hold these facilities but not extend their power makes diplomatic
sense, though it is not militarily rational. Either Russia can build the
geographical structure to support Crimea, or it becomes a permanent weak point
in the Russian position. The Russians do not want a massive confrontation with
the West at a time of economic
dysfunction, yet at the same time, having made the decision to hold Crimea,
they will not have a better moment for consolidation.
This is an ongoing
conversation in Moscow. It is not clear that it is over. The artillery may
simply be a minor probe or it could be the preface to an assault. We know that
there has been a significant increase in Russian presence in the pocket, but it
does not seem to us that the Russians are logistically ready for a major
offensive yet.
Taking Mariupol is a first
step to a broader offensive. It is also an end in itself, anchoring the
southern flank in the city, though may not even be that. However, the MLRS barrages
on Mariupol open the door to multiple avenues of exploitation and have clearly
moved the fighting to a new level, not so much in intensity, but in raising
serious questions of strategic intention.
"Red
Alert: Rocket Fire Could Signal New Offensive on Mariupol is
republished with permission of Stratfor.", January 24, 2015
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-