Andrew Korybko
It’s unlikely that Russia would risk rallying the West
around a no-fly zone over Ukraine by staging a deliberate provocation against
Poland or even just carrying out a recon mission in NATO airspace
Poland claimed to
have shot down several Russian drones on Wednesday morning that reportedly
crossed into its airspace during the latest large-scale strikes against
Ukraine. This occurred amidst the ongoing
Polish, Lithuanian, and NATO drills involving 30,000 Polish troops and
just ahead of the upcoming
Russian-Belarusian Zapad 2025 drills. Some therefore suspect that this was
either a deliberate provocation by Russia or a botched recon mission, but it
might have just been due
to NATO jamming.
It was recently argued that “There
Might Be More To The Von Der Leyen-GPS-Russia Hoax Than Scoring Cheap Infowar
Points” after the dramatic claim that Russia supposedly jammed her plane
while it attempted to land in Bulgaria was debunked by Sofia
itself and Western
media. The alternative theory put forth was that this false narrative was
meant to justify aggressive signals jamming in Kaliningrad, though this could
also be directed towards Belarus given its hosting of the upcoming Zapad 2025
drills.
Such interference might have thus caused Russian drones to veer off course into Poland during the latest large-scale strikes against Ukraine. Aggressive signals jamming could also precede implementation of reported plans for imposing a no-fly zone over at least part of Ukraine in connection with the West’s security guarantees for that country. Although nowhere as foolproof as patrols over Ukrainian airspace and authorizing NATO-based Patriots to protect its skies, it would carry much less of an escalation risk.
Moreover, if NATO expected
that its speculative signals jamming – possibly ramped up after the von der
Leyen-GPS-Russia hoax, which might have been timed to coincide with the
upcoming Zapad 2025 drills – would cause Russian drones to veer off course, then
this might be part of a preplanned escalation. The objective could be to rally
support for the abovementioned no-fly zone proposal or even begin the gradual
process of implementing it on the pretext of “proactive defense” in light of
this incident.
Over 3,5 years into the special operation,
Russia would have by now presumably gamed out everything that could
realistically follow the scenario of several of its drones crossing into
Poland, with policymakers thus likely being aware that this could be exploited
to advance the no-fly zone plot. The aforesaid insight accordingly reduces the
odds that this was a deliberate provocation or a botched recon mission, either
of which would have probably been carried out in force to make the cost-benefit
tradeoff more worthwhile.
This is a similar logic as
what was recently shared in this analysis here arguing
that Russia probably didn’t deliberately target the Cabinet of Ministers
building in Kiev so as to avoid fueling the no-fly zone plot. While that
particular incident might have been randomly caused by drone debris, the latest
one could have been planned to a much greater degree if NATO jamming was indeed
responsible as conjectured. It remains to be seen, however, whether Poland will
participate in any no-fly zone over Ukraine as a result.
Former President Andrzej
Duda recently
revealed that Zelensky tried to manipulate Poland into war with Russia
over November 2022’s Przewodow incident, which he refused to fall for, while
his successor Karol Nawrocki pledged ahead
of the second round not to deploy troops to Ukraine. This policy continuity,
which aligns with Poles getting
fed up with Ukrainian refugees and this neighboring
conflict, could foil NATO’s plans to manipulate Poland into this even
though it might still agree to ramp up signals jamming.
Andrew Korybko, Substack, September 11, 2025
Anteriores:The SCO & BRICS Play Complementary Roles In Gradually Transforming Global Governance
Here’s What the US’ Security Guarantees For Ukraine Might Look Like
Can Putin Legally Stop The Conflict Without First Controlling All The Disputed Territory?
What’s Standing In The Way Of A Grand Compromise On Ukraine?
Ukraine’s Romanian-Moldovan Flank Might Soon Be Used By NATO Against Russia
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-