Washington’s latest move treats Brazil’s censorship war
like a family business gone rogue
Dan Frieth
Viviane Barci de Moraes and
the Lex Institute, a legal and financial entity closely tied to the de Moraes
family’s wealth, were sanctioned Monday by both the State Department and the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).
The latest move builds on
the US designation of de Moraes in July for what Washington described as
“using his position to authorize arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppress
freedom of expression in Brazil.”
According to the Treasury,
“The Lex Institute acts as a holding company for de Moraes, owning his
residence in addition to other residential properties. The nominal ownership of
many of these properties was transferred from de Moraes and his family to the
Lex Institute over a decade ago. De Moraes’ wife, Viviane, is the Managing
Partner of the Lex Institute and has been the sole manager and administrator of
the Lex Institute since its establishment in 2000. Together, the Lex Institute
and Viviane hold the de Moraes family’s wealth.”
This round of sanctions comes
on the heels of the conviction of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro,
who, earlier this month, was sentenced to 27 years in prison for allegedly
leading a coup attempt in 2022; a move the Trump administration has condemned.
De Moraes continues to face growing international backlash for his aggressive role in silencing online platforms and targeting political expression across the internet.
Through a series of court
orders, platform suspensions, and content takedown demands, de Moraes has led
what many view as a state-backed effort to suppress speech under the banner of
combating disinformation.
In 2024, de Moraes ordered
the suspension of the social media platform X throughout Brazil, citing the company’s
refusal to comply with court orders requiring the removal of certain accounts.
The decision demanded that X
appoint a legal representative in Brazil and take action against users accused
of disseminating false information or promoting anti-democratic views.
When the company failed to
comply, the court threatened fines, blocked platform access via local internet
providers, and directed Apple and Google to remove the app from their Brazilian
stores.
That same censorship drive
extended to other platforms. In early 2025, de Moraes issued an order suspending access to Rumble,
a US-based video-sharing site, over its refusal to remove content and accounts
under judicial scrutiny.
Among those targeted was
exiled Brazilian commentator Allan dos Santos, whose channel was ordered offline. The ruling once again
required the platform to designate legal representation in Brazil and comply
with content takedown demands or face punitive action.
De Moraes has also ordered the removal or blocking of numerous social media accounts linked to journalists, influencers, and critics of the court. In some cases, individuals have faced detainment or threats of arrest for social media posts deemed offensive or “anti-democratic.”
Secretary of the Treasury
Scott Bessent stated, “Alexandre de Moraes is responsible for an oppressive
campaign of censorship, arbitrary detentions, and politicized
prosecutions—including against former President Jair Bolsonaro. Today’s action
makes clear that Treasury will continue to target individuals who provide
material support to de Moraes as he abuses human rights.”
The US has also sanctioned
Viviane under Executive Order 13818, which implements the Global Magnitsky
Human Rights Accountability Act.
According to the Treasury, she is being designated “for being, or having been, a leader or official of the Lex Institute, an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to E.O. 13818 as a result of activities related to Viviane’s tenure.”
These financial restrictions
add to a series of earlier penalties. In July, the Trump administration revoked
the US visas of de Moraes, his family, and close associates.
At that time, the
administration made clear that de Moraes’ actions had crossed a line.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio
reiterated that point in Monday’s announcement: “These sanctions build on a
series of actions taken by the Trump Administration to hold Moraes accountable
for abusing his authority, creating a censorship complex, blatantly targeting
political opponents, and committing serious human rights abuses. Those who
protect and enable foreign malign actors like Moraes threaten US interests and
will also be held to account.”
Dan Frieth, Reclaim the Net, September 23, 2025, 11h54
Deixa eu ver se entendi: o governo Trump — eleito democraticamente nos EUA e amparado pelas leis americanas que conferem ao Executivo a prerrogativa de conceder ou retirar vistos — estaria “violando o Estado Democrático de Direito”?
ResponderExcluirEntenda: para um comunista, qualquer medida que o prejudique é automaticamente “antidemocrática”. Por outro lado, qualquer ato que cale, persiga ou aprisione um opositor passa a ser exaltado como a mais alta expressão da democracia.