![]() |
Photo: Joe Raedle/Staff/Getty Images |
Ben Shapiro
In the aftermath of another
horrible and heartbreaking mass shooting at an American school, the same
political game took place that always takes place. That game breaks down into
three stages: before the facts come in, once the facts are in, and the actual
political debate.
Before The Facts Come In.
Before the facts come in,
proponents of gun control point at foreign countries and the lack of mass
shootings in those countries and suggest that Congress ought to do something —
anything, really — to make it more difficult for evil people to obtain guns.
They do not specify what that something is. But it must be a law, and it must
restrict law-abiding citizens’ access to guns. Furthermore, any Congressperson
who opposes such unspecified laws is the tool of the “gun industry.”
Meanwhile, those who oppose
gun control urge caution until we know the facts; often they offer thoughts and
prayers. Proponents of gun control then mock those thoughts and prayers in
order to imply that gun control opponents don’t care about dead children, and
merely want to avoid responsibility by throwing the problem at God.
The Facts Come In.
As the facts come in,
proponents of gun control maintain their staunch advocacy for their position,
but are often forced to acknowledge that their preferred measures wouldn’t have
done anything to stop the shootings at issue. That doesn’t stop them from
clubbing about the ears gun control opponents, who maintain that gun control
measures must be tailored toward stopping actual events.
Meanwhile, opponents of gun
control usually suggest two measures: mental health screening that would take
dangerous people off the streets and into treatment, and security in schools. These
are rejected out of hand by gun control proponents, who say they don’t want
those who are mentally ill avoiding treatment in order to avoid the
consequences of such treatment, and add that placing security in schools would
somehow “militarize” the school environment.
The Political Debate.
Congress usually proposes some
measure of gun control. That measure of gun control is usually far more
unpopular in specifics than it was in theory; it usually restricts rights most
Americans care about, and fails to properly target the underlying problem at
issue. Such measures almost universally fail. When they do pass, they show
little evidence of impact on mass shootings.
So, where does all of this
leave us?
Here’s what we know. The
shooter used an AR-15, the most common rifle in the United States. The shooter
was on the radar of school authorities, and he was reportedly in frequent
contact with the police; he was reported to the FBI as well, but follow-up was
apparently insufficient. People warned authorities about him, and they didn’t
do anything or couldn’t do anything. That’s probably the best place to start
looking for answers.
The shooter's gun was obtained
legally. He had never been arrested; it’s difficult to think of a way to
prevent the sale of a gun to a person with a clean record without a mass gun
ban or confiscation. He also had a gas mask and grenades — and it’s unclear
where he obtained the grenades. We could look at stronger prosecution of straw
buyers, as Jim Geraghty of National Review suggests, but that wouldn't have
helped in this case.
So, where do we go from here?
Obviously, I think that we ought to consider security in schools as a first
step — I went to a Jewish high school in Los Angeles that received bomb threats
at least twice a year; the building next door was scoped out by mass shooter
Buford Furrow, but he left thanks to security there. It’s not too much to ask
that we place armed security at our schools, as Israel does.
But this much is clear: snap
Twitter excoriations focused on casting aspersions at the character of our
political opposition tears our country apart right when we need to come
together in comfort. We have an unfortunate tendency to roll our eyes when
people say they’re waiting for the facts, whether we’re discussing mass
shootings or terrorist attacks; I’ve done it, too. But waiting for facts is the
responsible thing to do. And as the facts come in, perhaps better solutions
will make themselves clearer.
Ben Shapiro, The Daily Wire, 16-2-2018
ResponderExcluirO'Reilly's Analysis of the Florida School Shooting
ResponderExcluirThe New Mueller Indictment Against Russians UNDERCUTS Trump-Russia Collusion Claims