Rousseff shows White House an
authoritarian way forward
![]() |
President Obama meets with
Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff on April 9, 2012, in the Oval Office of the
White House.
Photo: Carolyn Kaster/Associated Press
|
President Obama hosted
Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff at
the White
House on Monday. One syndicated news story published before the
presidential parley asked, “What could Obama learn from Brazil President Dilma Rousseff?”
The optimistic answer is: hopefully not much. This relationship is not in
America’s interest.
Ms. Rousseff is
an exemplar of the anti-American hard left that is uniting in the developing
world to check U.S. power. One of the main goals of her mission to Washington
is to get Mr. Obama’s seal of approval for Brasilia’s ambition to acquire a
permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council. U.S. support for this scheme would be
self-destructive as Brazil would
provide a reliable vote against American interests in the world body. Ms. Rousseff, a
former communist guerrilla herself, is a strong supporter of anti-U.S.
dictatorships such as the Castros in Cuba and Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. She has
backed the Iranian mullahs’ efforts to acquire nuclear capability while leading
a club of nations pressing for U.S. nuclear disarmament. If the planet is
divided up between those who are for us and those who are against us, Ms. Rousseff is
on the wrong side.
Mr. Obama has nothing to learn
from Brazil’s
leader on the economic front, either. Before she came to power last year, the
South American giant finally seemed to be crawling into the society of serious
nations. Although an old-school liberal himself, Ms. Rousseff’s
predecessor, former President Lula da Silva,
took some big strides to improve Brazil’s business
climate and standing among investors by updating infrastructure, working
collaboratively with international nongovernmental organizations and pushing a
moderately pro-growth economic agenda. The perception of progress helped Brazil win the
2016 Olympic games and the 2014 World Cup, a crowning achievement for a
soccer-mad people.
Ms. Rousseff has
taken an abrupt fiscal U-turn, however, by clamping down on markets,
instituting miles of new red tape and ramping up government spending. Like in
Obama’s America, the result has been dramatic economic decline. During the
height of the Lula administration, confidence in Brazil’s direction led
to predictions of long-term economic growth rates of 5 percent and higher. But
under the new statist direction of the governing coalition led by Ms. Rousseff’s
Workers’ Party, the economy has tanked, with 2011’s gross domestic product only
growing by 2.7 percent, the lowest in South America.
Amazonian mischief is of
interest to Americans because Brasilia’s stranglehold on its people and economy
offers a cautionary tale about the threat unrestrained government power poses
to democracy. The increasing persecution of the conservative group Tradition,
Family and Property (TFP) exposes the dangers of dissent in the rapidly
secularizing world. Founded in the 1960s to fight communism and promote
traditional values, the TFP - which is well-known in Washington circles for its
active U.S. affiliate - is Brazil’s leading
opponent against leftist priorities such as abortion, censorship and
regulations that inhibit private-property rights. Because it stands in the way
of Big Brother, the government has gone after the TFP. Most recently, the
Superior Tribunal of Justice, one of Brazil’s upper-level
courts, ruled in favor of a splinter group, the Heralds of the Gospel. The
move, which occurred under strong pressure from church authorities including
the Vatican’s apostolic nuncio, is effectively gagging the TFP by handing its
assets over to liberal dissidents.
This tale matters because Brazil is now the
world’s sixth-largest economy and a leader of the coalition of second-tier
states looking to extract revenge for years of perceived Western “first world”
imperialism. The narrative mirrors Mr. Obama’s kneejerk “Blame America First”
worldview. Brasilia also shows how left-wing bureaucracies mobilize to stifle
dissent through censorship and confiscation of property when faced with public
opposition. This week’s confab between Mr. Obama and Ms. Rousseff was
more than a photo-op for two leftists whispering about what the world could be
if they had more power. It’s about what the world is already becoming.
The Washington Times, April
09, 2012
Grifos e Destaques: JP
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-