Simon Plosker
In recent days London has
experienced a similar incident to the many Palestinian stabbing attacks that
have taken place against Israelis over the past few months.
An attacker, who was later
found to have material linked to Syria and global terror on his cellphone,
slashed passersby at a London Underground station while shouting “this is
for Syria, my Muslim brothers.”
As far as the UK security
forces are concerned, this was an act of terrorism carried out by a radicalized
individual. Indeed, the Daily Mail’s Mail Online makes it quite clear
in its headline and opening sentence that this is terrorism.
Compare the above, however,
with a story published only hours later concerning
a terrorist knife attack in Jerusalem.
Note how in both headline and
text the word terrorist is in quotations to make it clear that this reference
to the Palestinian attacker is somehow up for debate.
By now, it is completely clear
that the Jerusalem attack was just the latest in a wave of Palestinian
terrorism aimed at both Israeli civilians and soldiers.
For the Mail Online (and
others) it appears that there is a different standard at work when it comes to
what is terrorism. When British people are on the receiving end it is
undoubtedly terrorism. When Israelis are the victims or Palestinians the
perpetrators, it is somehow questionable.
Yet one more example of the
insidious double standards at work in the media when it comes to coverage of
Israel.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-