Yarden Frankl
As Israeli voters turned out and gave the most
votes to the party of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the New York Times
goes all out with an editorial that can only charitably be labeled a
“diatribe.” (An Israeli Election Turns Ugly.)
By the title, you would think that Netanyahu
had arrested political opponents and muzzled the free Israeli press — tactics
reflective of the rule of the Palestinian Authority and Israel’s Middle East
neighbors. No, the New York Times
appears to be genuinely alarmed that Israeli voters chose a political party
with positions contrary to those of the Times editorial board.
There is nothing objectionable about the New
York Times giving its opinions on Israeli issues. That’s what the editorial
pages are for after all. However, there is something amiss when, rather than
educating readers about issues, the Times goes on a verbal rampage against the
head of the winning party.
Israel has a strong democratic process in which
a government that reflects the will of its citizens is chosen. While not
perfect, (and no democracy I know of is,) the fundamental principle that Israel
IS a democracy is no small matter. There is not a single other country in the
Middle East that is a democracy in the true meaning of the word. Not only do
Israel’s neighbors not allow meaningful votes, but they do not allow basic democratic
rights — free speech, free press, etc. — that those living in real democracies
take for granted.
Rather than labeling the Israeli elections
“ugly,” perhaps it should be the lack of elections in the region that the Times
should find more worthy of such a label. After all, it’s been several years
since Palestinians held elections of their own.
Summing up, the Times editorial claims that:
In his desperation,
Mr. Netanyahu resorted to fear-mongering and anti-Arab attacks while failing to
address the issues that Israelis said they were most worried about.
But the vote was an opportunity for Israelis to
make their feelings known. If he truly failed to address the issues Israelis
are “most worried about,” the Likud would not have won such a resounding victory.
Even if the Times doesn’t approve, it is up to Israeli citizens to choose a
government that represents the interests of the majority, a right denied to
those who live under the Palestinian Authority and in surrounding countries.
Yarden Frankl, HonestReporting, March 19, 2015
Relacionado:
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-