Andrew Korybko
It would be regrettable from Russia’s perspective but
not surprising if true
Zelensky claimed in late September
that “The Israeli system has been operating in Ukraine for a month. We will
receive [another] two Patriot systems in the fall, that’s all I’m going to
say.” This follows long-running reports, previously denied by the
Israeli Foreign Ministry as recently as June, that Israel agreed to a
triangular arrangement whereby it’ll return these US systems for refurbishment
before the US then transfers them to Ukraine. It was assessed here at
the time that this would harm ties with Russia if true.
That analysis also assessed
that “Russia will probably just file a formal complaint and at most flirt with
designating Israel as an ‘unfriendly country’”, but “the second possibility
can’t be taken for granted” given their interests in
Syria vis-à-vis Turkiye and Israel continuing to defy US pressure to sanction
Russia. Nevertheless, in spite of the aforesaid, Israel might have still very
well gone along with the US’ triangular arrangement for bolstering Ukraine’s
air defenses for the reasons that’ll now be explained.
In brief, Russia is no longer a significant factor in Syria’s domestic, foreign, or security affairs, thus reducing its utility to Israel there and correspondingly eroding Israel’s prior resistance to this proposal. Moreover, even though Russia wisely chose not to ally with the now-defeated Resistance Axis last fall when Israel crushed Hezbollah and didn’t step in to defend Iran during this summer’s joint Israeli-US bombing campaign, Israel still presumably dislikes the continued closeness of Russian-Iranian ties.
The combination of these two
coupled with Bibi’s desire to remain in Trump’s good graces or at the very
least not widen their repeatedly rumored rift cogently
accounts for why the Israeli leader might have finally acceded to this
long-running request. If this is one of those rare instances where Zelensky is
telling the truth, then it wouldn’t significantly change anything though,
neither in terms of the Ukrainian
Conflict’s military-strategic dynamics nor Russian-Israeli
relations.
Regarding the first, Russia
continues to win the “race
of logistics”/“war
of attrition” with NATO, which can’t produce enough military-technical
equipment to prevent Ukraine from continuing to cede ground. It’s for precisely
this reason that NATO might
directly intervene in the conflict, which it could justify by shooting
down Russian jets on the false pretext that they violated the bloc’s
airspace, absent which Zelensky might stage a false
flag drone provocation blamed on Russia in pursuit of the same end.
As for the second, Israel
remains reluctant to escalate tensions with Russia through the direct dispatch
of offensive military-technical equipment to Ukraine like it and the US have
long wanted due to the fear that this could provoke Russia into more muscularly
supporting Iran, thus worsening Israel’s security. Likewise, Russia probably
won’t do anything other than ramp up its pro-Palestinian rhetoric in response
to this triangular arrangement since it doesn’t want Israel to sanction it,
which would ruin their relations.
The end result is that Israel’s indirect transfer of older US Patriots to Ukraine won’t significantly change anything. It’s regrettable from Russia’s perspective but shouldn’t have been surprising due to how much less of a role Russia has played in Israel’s security ever since Assad’s fall. Closer Russian-Iranian ties also predictably pushed Israel into wanting to symbolically signal its displeasure one way or another. This is therefore arguably a non-event but will still likely be spun by the usual suspects as a pretty big deal.
Andrew Korybko, Substack, October 7, 2025
Anteriores:Five Reasons Why The Latest Czech Elections Were So Important
Russia’s Support For Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan Isn’t Surprising
Was Scandinavia’s Russian Drone Scare A False Flag To Crack Down On Russia’s Shadow Fleet?
Zelensky Is Manipulating Trump Into A Disaster Of Epic Proportions
How Far Will The German Elite Go In Resisting The Winds Of Change?
Trump’s Proposal For NATO To Stop Buying Russian Oil & Start Tariffing China Is Unrealistic
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-