Andrew Korybko
Trump isn’t expected to extend Article 5 mutual defense guarantees to allies’ forces in third countries like Ukraine since they might provoke a war with Russia that could then drag in the US
Zelensky demanded a minimum of 200,000 European peacekeepers during the panel session that followed his speech at Davos, which itself saw him propose that France, Germany, Italy, and the UK combine their forces with Ukraine’s in order to counter Russia’s in nearly equal numbers. He also suggested that Trump will abandon Europe in order to cut a deal over Ukraine with Russia and China. The subtext is that they should organize a large-scale peacekeeping mission before that happens.
They’re unlikely to accede to his demand, however, for the same
reason that the UK is unlikely to actually establish a military base in Ukraine
like it agreed to explore doing in their new 100-year partnership pact.
None of the Europeans want to risk a war with Russia where they’d be left
fighting on their own without American support,
not even the nuclear-armed UK and France, since Trump isn’t expected to extend
Article 5 mutual defense guarantees to allies’ forces in third countries like
Ukraine.
He, who loves having as much control over everything as
possible, naturally wouldn’t feel comfortable knowing that others could provoke
a war with Russia that might then drag in the US. Trump’s grand strategic goal
is to wrap up the Ukrainian Conflict as
soon as possible so as to prioritize his far-reaching domestic reform plans
while “Pivoting (back) to Asia” to more muscularly contain China. Anything that
could come in the way of that agenda, especially others provoking a war with
Russia, is anathema.
That said, it can’t be ruled out the Europeans might assemble a large-scale force on Ukraine’s Polish and Romanian borders for rapid deployment in the event of future hostilities, regardless of whether this is coordinated through US-controlled NATO or outside of it. For that to happen, however, Polish-Ukrainian ties would have to improve (Zelensky ignored Poland in his speech despite it having NATO’s third-largest army) and Romania’s populist frontrunner would have to lose May’s presidential election rerun.
Moreover, Europe would need to make meaningful progress on
building the “military Schengen” for
facilitating the movement of troops and equipment through the bloc to its
eastern borders, otherwise whatever it assembles on the Ukrainian frontier and
then sends across it would be logistically vulnerable. Polish-Ukrainian ties
haven’t yet improved, Romania’s presidential election rerun hasn’t yet
happened, and the “military Schengen” remains mostly on paper, all of which
work against Zelensky’s plans.
Consequently, the likelihood of the Europeans assembling a
large-scale force on Ukraine’s Polish and Romanian borders anytime soon is low,
let alone them unilaterally deploying peacekeepers – whether 200,000 or just
2,000 – to Ukraine without prior US approval. Nevertheless, Zelensky’s Davos
speech and panel session might serve to plant the seed of “ambitious thinking”
in European policymakers’ minds, which could lead to them initiating such
discussions with the US.
From Trump’s perspective, it’s important to “share the burden”
in Ukraine and ideally offload as much of it as possible onto the Europeans’
shoulders, though without emboldening them to provoke a war with Russia
afterwards. To that end, he might publicly flirt with some variation of
Zelensky’s European peacekeeper proposal, but only as part of a negotiating
tactic with Putin so that he can then rescind it as a faux concession in
exchange for something more tangible and meaningful from his counterpart.
Trump might also ultimately authorize the US to take the lead in
assembling the aforementioned large-scale force on Ukraine’s Polish and
Romanian borders, but conditional on all NATO members agreeing to his demand
that they spend 5% of GDP on defense. There might also be other strings
attached too, such as trade-related ones, for “comforting” them in this way by
making a show out of not “abandoning” Europe like Zelensky just fearmongered
that he might be plotting.
One way to coerce them to do both, namely spend 5% of GDP on
defense while agreeing to trade-related concessions for leading an
unprecedented NATO buildup on Ukraine’s western borders to “deter Russia” after
the conflict ends, is to demand drastic cuts to the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
Zelensky warned during his panel session that Putin
might demand a five-fold reduction per the precedent from spring 2022’s draft treaty,
and if Trump agrees, then this might spook Europe into doing what he demands.
Whatever he ends up doing, the odds of him allowing the
Europeans to unilaterally dispatch any number of peacekeepers to Ukraine are
close to nil due to the chance that they’d provoke a war with Russia that could
risk dragging in the US, thus derailing his domestic and foreign policy
agendas. All that he has to do to prevent this is make clear that Article 5
mutual defense guarantees won’t be extended to those of their forces in third
countries no matter the circumstances of the attacks that they might come
under.
The only scenario in which he might countenance this is if he’s tricked by the military-industrial complex, the Europeans (especially outgoing Polish President Andrzej Duda who’s one of his close friends), and misguided advisors into turning Ukraine into his Vietnam like Steven Bannon just warned. While there are causes for concern, most notably his remarks about Russia after the inauguration, it’s premature to conclude that he’ll go this route so the European peacekeeper scenario remains very unlikely.
Andrew Korybko, Substack, Janvier 24, 2025
Anteriores:Analyzing Ukraine’s Attempted Drone Strike On TurkStream’s Russian Infrastructure
Sikorski Fears That Musk Might Try To Stop Polish Liberals From Capturing The Presidency
The Political Consequences Of Ukraine’s Decision To Cut Off Russian Gas To Europe
Trump Should Terminate The Bilateral Security Agreement Between The US & Ukraine
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-