Andrew Korybko
He’s the opposition’s chief economist and tasked with
de-Russifying the energy industry if they win, which would catalyze cascading
consequences that subordinate Hungary to globalism like Soros has sought to do,
thus making this former Shell vice president Hungary’s grey cardinal in that
event
The Third
Gulf War has been raging for almost a month and the global energy
crisis has only just begun. The disruption of regional exports and destruction
of energy infrastructure have already led to price spikes that are expected to
further worsen as strategic reserves dry up. Energy-intensive industries might
scale back production, fuel-saving measures like reduced school weeks could
follow, and rationing can’t be ruled out. Under such conditions, reliable
access to affordable energy is a national security priority.
The Hungarian opposition party
Tisza, which is expected to give Viktor Orban’s ruling Fidesz a run for its
money ahead of next month’s parliamentary elections, has made de-Russifying the
energy industry a major part of their platform. This remains the case in spite
of the global energy crisis due to the influence of their European
and Ukrainian patrons. Even if they drop that policy or announce that it’ll
be postponed, which is possible given its unpopularity right now, there’s a
good reason not to believe them.
It was announced in January
that Istvan Kapitany, Shell’s former Vice President for Mobility till 2024,
will join Tisza as its chief economic advisor. Local news magazine Mandiner reported
that Shell made record profits throughout the course of the Ukrainian
Conflict ranging from $5-20 billion more a year since 2022 when
compared to 2021. He’s thought to still own a lot of shares, however, which
contextualizes why he reaffirmed Tisza’s energy de-Russification policy in his
first interview that month.
He was appointed precisely for implementing this policy, particularly through his vast array of industry contacts that he cultivated during his nearly four-decade-long career at Shell, so there shouldn’t be any doubt that Tisza does indeed want to achieve this even if they shift their rhetoric for electoral purposes. Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto warned after Kapitany’s aforementioned interview that household utility costs would triple and industrial production could plummet, thus leading to economic suicide.
Kapitany would profit in that
scenario, ergo his interest in having it happen, and his former employer Shell
would obtain de facto control over the national energy company MOL with
disastrous consequences for Hungary’s hard-earned national sovereignty during
the Orban era. That’s the inevitable outcome of voluntarily cutting Hungary off
from reliable access to affordable Russian energy in the midst of a worsening
economic crisis with a former foreign energy executive leading its economic
policy.
In effect, Kapitany is poised
to become Hungary’s grey cardinal if Tisza forms the next government, and his
arguable foreign allegiances would amount to him essentially succeeding where
his compatriot George Soros failed in subordinating their country to globalism.
Apart from the disastrous consequences for the economy and national
sovereignty, Hungarian security would also be adversely affected as the country
is expected to arm Ukraine if Orban is ousted, thus making it a co-belligerent
against Russia.
With this in mind, observers shouldn’t doubt that Tisza will indeed de-Russify the Hungarian energy industry if they win no matter whether their rhetoric about this shifts amidst the global energy crisis, and the cascading consequences of that move would subordinate their country to globalism as explained. Kapitany’s appointment is ipso facto proof of their intentions, and he himself is embedded deeply in the globalist system so as to implement this plan with relative ease at the expense of Hungary’s interests.
Andrew Korybko, Substack,
March 22, 2026
The EU Poses A Much More Credible Threat To Russia Than The Inverse
Why Do More Russians Perceive Poland To Be An Enemy Than They Do Any Other Country?
The DROP Act Is An Unprecedented Weapon Of Financial Warfare Against Russia
The Planned “NATO Bank” Is Expected To Finance Europe’s Impending Arms Race With Russia
Three Scenarios For How The Iran War Might End

Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-