Andrew Korybko
Putin
made the right choice, which was always driven by his rational calculation of
what was in Russia’s objective interests as a state, not due to “Zionist
influence” like some in the Alt-Media Community now ridiculously claim to
defame him after being mad that he didn’t lift a finger to save the Resistance
The Iranian-led Resistance Axis has been defeated by Israel.
Hamas’ terrorist attack on 7 October 2023 prompted Israel’s collective
punishment of the Palestinians in Gaza, which set into motion a series of
conflicts that expanded to Lebanon and Syria. Israel has also bombed Yemen and
Iran. Hamas’ and Hezbollah’s leaderships were destroyed, leading to a ceasefire
in Lebanon, while the Assad government was just overthrown by
a Turkish-backed terrorist blitz that severed Iran’s military logistics to
Hezbollah.
These outcomes were already surprising enough for those who
believed the late Nasrallah’s claim that “Israel is weaker than a spider web”,
but many were shocked that they occurred without Russia lifting a finger to
save the Resistance, with whom they thought that it had allied against Israel
long ago. That second-mentioned false notion will go down in infamy as one of
the most successful psy-ops ever conducted against the Alt-Media Community (AMC),
and ironically enough, by its own top influencers.
It was explained in early October “Why False Perceptions About Russian Policy Towards Israel Continue To Proliferate”, which readers should review for more detail, but which can be summarized as top AMC influencers telling their audience what they thought they wanted to hear for self-interested reasons. These include generating clout, pushing their ideology, and/or soliciting donations from well-intentioned but naïve members of their audience depending on the personality involved.
The preceding analysis also lists five related ones about
Russian policy towards Israel since the start of the West Asian Wars, including
this one “Clarifying Lavrov’s Comparison Of The Latest Israeli-Hamas War To Russia’s Special Operation”, which
itself links to several dozen others. All of them also reference this May 2018
report about “President Putin On Israel: Quotes From The Kremlin Website (2000-2018)”. All of these materials rely on official
and authoritative Russian sources to arrive at their conclusions.
They prove that Putin is a proud lifelong philo-Semite who never
shared the Resistance’s unifying anti-Zionist ideology, instead always
expressing very deep respect for Jews and the State of Israel. Accordingly, as
the final decisionmaker on Russian foreign policy, he tasked his diplomats with
balancing between Israel and the Resistance. To that end, Russia never took
either’s side and always remained neutral in their disputes, including the West
Asian Wars.
The most that he ever personally did was condemn Israel’s
collective punishment of the Palestinians, but always in the same breath as
condemning Hamas’ infamous terrorist attack on 7 October 2023. As for Russia,
the most that it ever did was repeat the same rhetoric and occasionally condemn
Israel’s strikes against the IRGC and Hezbollah in Syria, which Russia never
interfered with. Not once did it try to deter or intercept them, retaliate
afterwards, or give Syria the capabilities and authorization to do
so either.
This was due to the deconfliction
mechanism that Putin and Bibi agreed to in late
September 2015 shortly before the Syrian operation. It was never confirmed for
obvious diplomatic reasons, but these actions (or rather lack thereof)
suggested that Putin believed that Iran’s anti-Israeli activities Syria posed a
legitimate threat to Israel. For that reason, Russia always stood aside
whenever Israel bombed Iran there, but Russia still sometimes complained due to
Israel’s attacks formally violating international law.
It’s an objectively existing and easily verifiable fact that
Russia’s opposition to Israel’s regional activities, be they in Gaza, Lebanon,
Syria, Yemen, or Iran, always remained strictly confined to the political realm
of official statements. Not once did Russia ever threaten to unilaterally
sanction Israel, let alone even remotely hint at military action against it as
punishment. Russia won’t even symbolically designate Israel as an “unfriendly
state”, though that’s because it doesn’t abide by US sanctions and won’t arm
Ukraine.
Therein lies another fact that most in the AMC were either
unaware of or in denial about and it’s that Israel isn’t the US’ puppet
otherwise it would have already done those two things long ago. It’s beyond the
scope of the present piece to explain this, as well as why the Biden
Administration has tried to destabilize and overthrow Bibi, but this
analysis here dives into the details and cites
related articles. The point is that Russian-Israeli ties remain cordial and
these two are far from the foes that some thought.
It therefore never made sense to imagine that Putin, who considers himself to be the consummate
pragmatist, would burn the bridge that he personally
invested nearly a quarter-century of his time building with Bibi between their
two nations. After all, Putin boasted in 2019 that “Russians and Israelis
have ties of family and friendship. This is a true common family; I can say
this without exaggeration. Almost 2 million Russian speakers live in Israel. We
consider Israel a Russian-speaking country.”
He was speaking before the Keren Heyesod Foundation, one of the world’s oldest Zionist lobbying
organizations, during its annual conference in Moscow that year. Whenever
members of the AMC were confronted with these “politically inconvenient” facts
from official and authoritative sources such as the Kremlin’s own website, they
spun a “5D chess master plan” conspiracy theory alleging that he was just
“psyching out the Zionists”. Top influencers also aggressively “canceled”
anyone who brought this up.
The end result was that these false perceptions of
Russian-Israeli relations as well as Putin’s own views towards this subject
continued to proliferate unchallenged through the AMC, thus leading to the
impression that they were secretly allied with Iran due to their allegedly
shared anti-Zionist ideals. This notion became a matter of dogma for many in
the AMC and correspondingly turned into an axiom of International Relations for
them. Anyone who claimed otherwise was smeared as a “Zionist”.
It's now known after Russia didn’t lift a finger to save the
Resistance that they were never actually allies. Some of those that still can’t
accept that they’ve been lied to by trusted AMC influencers who duped them for
self-interested reasons (clout, ideology, and/or soliciting donations) now
speculate that Russia “betrayed” the Resistance and “sold out to the Zionists”
even though Russia was never on either’s side. If they don’t soon shake off
their cognitive dissonance, they’ll detach themselves further from reality.
In retrospect, Russia dodged a bullet by wisely choosing not to
ally with the now-defeated Resistance Axis since it would have needlessly
ruined its relations with Israel, the undisputable victor of the West Asian
Wars. Putin made the right choice, which was always driven by his rational
calculation of what was in Russia’s objective interests as a state, not due to
“Zionist influence” like some in the AMC now ridiculously claim to defame him
after being mad that he didn’t lift a finger to save the Resistance.
The takeaways from this are several: 1) Putin and his representatives don’t play “5D chess”, they always say what they truly mean; 2) Russia isn’t anti-Israel nor anti-Zionist, but it also isn’t anti-Iran nor anti-Resistance either; 3) the AMC is full of charlatans who, for self-interested reasons, tell their audience whatever they think they want to hear; 4) their audience should thus hold them to account for lying about Russian-Israeli and Russian-Resistance relations; 5) and the AMC requires urgent reform.
Andrew Korybko, Substack, December 12, 2024
Anteriores:Zelensky’s Flip-Flop On Ceasefire Terms Is A Faux Concession
The Outcome Of Romania’s Presidential Election Could Spoil The US’ Potential Escalation Plans
Putin Is Finally Climbing The Escalation Ladder
Russia’s Updated Nuke Doctrine Aims To Deter Unacceptable Provocations From NATO
The US Is Unlikely To Coerce Zelensky Into Holding Elections Without A Ceasefire First Did The Latest BRICS Summit Achieve Anything Of Tangible Significance At All?
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-