Andrew Korybko
The irony is that they actually ended up building a
liberal dystopia instead of a “fascist utopia”
The “Organization of Ukrainian
Nationalists (OUN) and their militant “Ukrainian Insurgent Army” (UPA)
wing, which
genocided Poles and others in pursuit of an
ethnically pure state, are the founding fathers of post-“Maidan” Ukraine.
Ukrainian nationalists thus assumed that their fight against Russia from 2014,
and especially after the start of the special
operation in 2022, would advance this goal. Kiev’s banning of the
Russian language, elements of Russian culture, and the Ukrainian Orthodox
Church gave them hope.
This fantasy was just
shattered by his Chief of Staff Kirill Budanov, who reaffirmed in late June what
he said
earlier in spring about the country’s need to attract more migrants
since “There are significantly fewer of us now. I don’t want to scare anyone,
but significantly fewer.” Around six weeks prior in early May, Minister of
Social Policy Denis Uliutin revealed that only
22-25 million people still live in Ukraine. Of them, at least 10
million are pensioners per the Pension Fund of Ukraine’s estimate in
early April.
To make matters even more concerning, UNICEF estimated last year that there are 6.6 million children under the age of 18, so taken together, that leaves just 6-9 million working-age adults left in the country. The World Bank’s latest data from 2024 estimates that males comprise 46% of the population, so that would roughly mean that Ukraine has only 2.76-4.14 million working-age males, a non-insignificant but unclear percentage of whom were either killed or permanently handicapped by the ongoing conflict.
If one accepts the Center for
Strategic and International Studies’ (likely lowball) early
2026 figure of 500,000-600,000 Ukrainian casualties, then this means
that Ukraine only has between a little more than 2 million and 3.5 million
working-age males at most. Budanov therefore wasn’t exaggerating when he said
that “There are significantly fewer of us now.” Of the 4.3
million Ukrainians in the EU, only 26% are adult men, so slightly over 1
million, and not all of them will return even after the conflict ends.
Ukraine will correspondingly
have to promote the mass migration of civilizationally dissimilar foreigners,
whether for economic and/or population replacement purposes, and they’re not
expected to assimilate if the Western European precedent is anything to go by.
Moreover, Ukraine can’t realistically ban their languages since they don’t
speak Ukrainian and might not be fluent in English, which a 2024 law incidentally mandated
across the state bureaucracy in a move that must have flustered the
nationalists.
Far from becoming the
ethnically pure state that they fantasized would follow the end of the
conflict, Ukraine is on pace to become as multicultural as the most extreme
cases in Western Europe, with English also likely replacing
Ukrainian in everyday life as the lingua franca among its diverse
population. Just as bad from the nationalists’ perspective was Zelensky offering
his Western partners “patronage over a particular region of Ukraine,
city, community or industry” at May 2022’s World Economic Forum.
The end result is therefore
that Ukraine lost both its identity and sovereignty throughout the conflict
unlike how the nationalists expected it to preserve both through their
“sacrifice”. A split between them and the state is thus likely, though given how
predictable this is, the SBU is probably already monitoring them to
preemptively avert any manifestations of dissent, especially those that could
take violent forms. The irony is that Ukrainian nationalists ended up building
a liberal dystopia instead of a “fascist utopia”.
Andrew Korybko, Substack, July 13, 2026
Anteriores:Poland Finally Realizes The Geostrategic Challenge Posed By Ukraine
Poland Could Quickly Denazify Ukraine Without Firing A Single Shot But Tusk Refuses To Do So
Zelensky’s 40-Day Influence Operation Against Russia Is Unlikely To Succeed
Ukraine’s Spree Of Strikes Against Russia Is More Showmanship Than Strategy
Russia Must Defeat Ukraine Before Trump 2.0’s “War Of Attrition” Really Gets Going
Who Won The Third Gulf War?

Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-