Andrew Korybko
One of the special operation’s goals is to neutralize
these Ukrainian terrorist threats to civilians that Russia long foresaw but was
unable to preemptively avert through diplomatic means
Three waves of Ukrainian
drones struck a dormitory in Starobelsk, a town in Russia’s formerly Ukrainian
Lugansk Region, last week in an attack that killed nearly two dozen students.
Russia’s Permanent Representative to the UN brought it up at an emergency meeting only
to be met with denials by Ukraine that any attack had even taken place despite
indisputable evidence to the contrary. About that, the BBC and
CNN rejected
Russia’s invitation to visit the site, and EU leaders remain
silent about the attack.
Whether Ukraine deliberately
targeted the dormitory like Russia claims given its track record of terrorist
attacks since the special
operation began or it was a case of faulty intelligence like others
have speculated, its official response at the UN is self-discrediting and
should raise suspicions among all. Flat-out denying that any incident took
place and instead describing claims thereof as “baseless”, even adding that
they “belong to a textbook disinformation campaign from Moscow”, is over the
top.
Western media like the BBC and CNN probably sense that something is wrong, most likely that Ukraine might have struck the dormitory due to faulty intelligence and is now denying it just like it denied accidentally bombing Poland in November 2022 after two Poles died, ergo why they won’t visit the site. They don’t want to give additional attention to this incident and hope that it’ll fade from the Western public’s consciousness, among those who are even aware of it, or be spun into a conspiracy theory.
Any on-the-ground reporting
that lends credence to Russia’s claims of Ukrainian complicity, whether
deliberate or accidental, could further reduce support for continued military
aid. If a truly neutral investigation were to be launched by at least one of
Ukraine’s Western partners, then Kiev might either stonewall it or evidence
might be destroyed, both of which would make Ukraine look guilty. There’s also
a chance that the investigation uncovers proof that speculative faulty
intelligence was the West’s fault.
For these reasons, the BBC and CNN are
content with only making passive mention of this incident in the context of
Russia’s Oreshnik retaliation over the weekend, and they’re only doing so to
retain a semblance of journalistic credibility instead of not reporting on it
at all like they’d probably
prefer. It’s also possible that the BBC’s formal state patron and CNN’s
informal one discreetly conveyed to their respective editors-in-chief that they
mustn’t visit Starobelsk and they dutifully obeyed with this demand.
Speculation about their
motives aside, the takeaway is that Ukraine will never take accountability for
even possibly accidental attacks against civilians, let alone those that it
carried out on purpose like in Kursk Region and other parts of Russia. The Western
media will cover up for them too, and nothing will change till the end of the
special operation, at which time Russia hopes to neutralize this threat to its
civilians that it long foresaw but was unable to preemptively avert through
diplomatic means.
What this means in practice is
that the special operation will either continue till its military goals are met
in full, namely Ukraine’s demilitarization, or compromises
that might be agreed to instead must ensure that Ukraine is made aware
that such attacks would instantly trigger
outsized retaliation. All that’s known for sure is that Russia will never
accept a future where its people are regularly targeted by Ukrainian terrorist
attacks of any kind so it’ll do all that it realistically can to bring this to
a lasting end.
Andrew Korybko, Substack, May 26, 2026
Anteriores:Germany’s Military Patronage Of Ukraine Is A Crucial Part Of Its Grand Strategy
Trump's Neo-Reagan Doctrine Is Rolling Back Russian Influence Across The World
The New Russian-Indian Military Logistics Pact Sends Five Messages To The World
The US Demanded That The Europeans Accelerate Their Transition To “NATO 3.0”
The EU’s €90 Billion Loan To Ukraine Is Meant To Buy Time For The Democrats To Return

Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-