Andrew Korybko
Ideological, economic, and personal interests are
responsible for the ruling liberal elite’s fateful decision that’ll lead to
Germany replacing the US as Russia’s top perceived adversary
The Financial Times reported
in early July that “Germany to borrow €800bn
for rearmament in historic shift”. The larger context concerns the “NATO
3.0” concept that the US is implementing whereby it’s pushing the European
members of the bloc to take more responsibility for their security. In
practice, this means that the EU will lead Russia’s containment in Western
Eurasia per the new “cordon
sanitaire” that Trump 2.0 built around it over the past year, with Germany
planning to play the main role in this theater.
It’s presently competing
with Poland for leadership over Central & Eastern Europe (CEE) in
coordination with its Ukrainian junior partner,
but even if Poland manages to carve out a “sphere
of influence” for itself, Germany’s planned €800 billion remilitarization
ensures that it’ll remain a force to be reckoned with. It’s already the case
that “The
EU Poses A Much More Credible Threat To Russia Than The Inverse”, but now,
“Germany
Might Replace The US As Russia’s Top Perceived Adversary”.
Former President and incumbent Deputy Chair of the Security Council Dmitry Medvedev warned in early May about the 1941-threat posed by Germany’s remilitarization, and recently, top Russian expert Dmitry Trenin argued that it’s now the EU – and not the US – that’s fanning the flames of war with Russia. Since Germany is the bloc’s de facto leader, it therefore follows that it’s the country most responsible for placing NATO and Russia on the path to clashing around 2030 like Moscow now expects is possible.
The main driving forces behind
this development are ideological and economic. As regards the first, the ruling
liberal elite conceptualize their theater of the New Cold War as a struggle
between “democracy and dictatorship”, while the second relates to the
military-industrial complex convincing the elite’s more cautious members that
massive investments in this sphere can avert Germany’s
deindustrialization. High energy costs and competition
from China, however, are what’s actually responsible for that trend.
Nevertheless, the ruling
liberal elite already decided to compete with Poland for leadership over CEE
and within the European part of “NATO 3.0” as a whole, though this is
indisputably at the expense of its socio-economic stability after British media
recently observed that “Germany is quietly
falling apart”. Containing Russia, which has absolutely zero interest in
testing its nuclear-armed American rival’s commitment to Article 5, nowadays
takes precedence over improving the lives of the German people.
The ruling liberal elite’s
commitment to the aforesaid ideological cause, which some of them have been
misled into thinking is the key to rejuvenating their country’s declining
economy, might also be influenced by the perceived prestige that they expect to
accompany playing this geopolitical role. Being celebrated across Europe by
their fellow elites for this, not to mention receiving public approval from the
American elite to whom they look up per their inferiority complex, is
personally important to them.
From Russia’s perspective,
Germany is rapidly becoming its most serious security threat in Western Eurasia
by far, and no policymaker should assume that Germany will deviate from this
trajectory. A preemptive strike is unrealistic due to Article 5, and reminding
average Germans that they’re now in Russia’s nuclear crosshairs due to their
ruling liberal elite’s policies won’t change anything. Be that as it may,
nobody should doubt that Russia would retaliate with nukes if the German-led EU
ever attacked it.
Andrew Korybko, Substack,
July 20, 2026
Poles Shouldn’t Let Themselves Be Duped By Zelensky’s Dishonest Reconciliation Attempt
Budanov Crushed Ukrainian Nationalists’ Fantasy Of An Ethnically Pure State
Poland Finally Realizes The Geostrategic Challenge Posed By Ukraine
Poland Could Quickly Denazify Ukraine Without Firing A Single Shot But Tusk Refuses To Do So
Zelensky’s 40-Day Influence Operation Against Russia Is Unlikely To Succeed
Ukraine’s Spree Of Strikes Against Russia Is More Showmanship Than Strategy
Russia Must Defeat Ukraine Before Trump 2.0’s “War Of Attrition” Really Gets Going
Who Won The Third Gulf War?

Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não publicamos comentários de anônimos/desconhecidos.
Por favor, se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-