Sarah Taylor
Former President Donald Trump issued a scathing rebuke of Big Tech in an op-ed published Thursday in the Wall Street Journal, detailing why he is suing Big Tech giants and how he believes certain corporations are complicit in squashing the speech and diverse ideas of everyday American people.
Liberal social media quickly
went into a frenzy over the paper's decision to allow the former president to
write a piece for its pages.
What are the details?
In his article "Why I'm
Suing Big Tech," Trump explained that he believes Big Tech is working in
tandem with the government to "censor the free speech of the American
people."
"One of the gravest
threats to our democracy today is a powerful group of Big Tech corporations
that have teamed up with the government to censor the free speech of the
American people," he wrote.
Pointing out that the very
idea is not just wrong, but unconstitutional, the former president vowed,
"To restore free speech for myself and for every American, I am suing Big
Tech to stop it.
"Social media has become
as central to free speech as town meeting halls, newspapers, and television
networks were in prior generations," he continued. "The internet is
the new public square."
Trump added that in recent
years Big Tech platforms have been censoring Americans and discriminating
against free speech by de-platforming, suspensions, and more, "controlling
the political debate" in America.
"Consider content that
was censored in the past year," he wrote. "Big Tech companies banned
users from their platforms for publishing evidence that showed the coronavirus
emerged from a Chinese lab, which even the corporate media now admits may be
true."
He also pointed to Big Tech's censorship on hydroxychloroquine treatment for COVID-19 cases as well as how the mainstream media and social media networks appeared to quash reports about the laptop controversy surrounding President Joe Biden's son, Hunter, and more.
"Perhaps most egregious,
in the weeks after the election, Big Tech blocked the social media accounts of
the sitting president," Trump continued. "If they can do it to me,
they can do it to you — and believe me, they are."
Pointing to his recent
class-action lawsuit against Big Tech giants such as Facebook CEO Mark
Zuckerberg, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, and Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Trump added,
"This flagrant attack on free speech is doing terrible damage to our
country."
"The suit seeks damages
to deter such behavior in the future and injunctions restoring my
accounts.," he added.
In a Wednesday statement
announcing the suit, the former president said, "I stand before you this
morning to announce a very important and very beautiful, I think, development
for our freedom and our freedom of speech. ... Today, in conjunction with the
America First Policy Institute, I'm filing as the lead class action
representative a major class action lawsuit against the Big Tech giants
including Facebook, Google and Twitter, as well as their CEOs."
The lawsuit is seeking an
immediate injunction to stop social media platforms from what he says is the
"illegal, shameful censorship of the American people."
"Our case will prove this
censorship is unlawful, it's unconstitutional, and it's completely
un-American," Trump added.
Trump, concluding the op-ed,
warned that Democrats are coordinating with Big Tech to suppress any
nonconformist thought from social media platforms.
"This coercion and
coordination is unconstitutional," he insisted. "The Supreme Court
has held that Congress can't use private actors to achieve what the
Constitution prohibits it from doing itself. In effect, Big Tech has been
illegally deputized as the censorship arm of the U.S. government. This should
alarm you no matter your political persuasion. It is unacceptable, unlawful and
un-American."
What are people saying?
One user complained,
"Trump screams 'I AM BEING CENSORED!' from the editorial page of a
mainstream international media outlet. Shame on you, @WSJ, shame on you,
@WSJopinion."
Another added, "It's not the biggest takeaway from Trump's
op-ed (the biggest has to do with what WSJ opinion has become) but it was still
perplexing to me that Trump's use of 'illegal alien' wasn't changed by an
editor. AP stopped using the term in 2013, and many pubs have since followed
suit."
"WSJ must know the case
has no merit and is being used as a fundraising tool. You have some duty to
your readers don't you? Maybe some duty to yourselves? Some code of
ethics?" another fumed.
"And again, reminding me
why I canceled my WSJ subscription," one user quipped.
Another took aim at the paper
for not being "serious" or thoughtful."
"Future generations will
marvel when we tell them the Wall Street Journal was once considered a serious,
thoughtful newspaper," the user wrote.
Another snarked, "*NOTE* @WSJopinion is not @WSJ, rather more
similar to right-wing propagandists such as @seanhannity and @OANN."
Sarah Taylor, The
Blaze, July 9, 2021
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Não aceitamos/não publicamos comentários anônimos.
Se optar por "Anônimo", escreva o seu nome no final do comentário.
Não use CAIXA ALTA, (Não grite!), isto é, não escreva tudo em maiúsculas, escreva normalmente. Obrigado pela sua participação!
Volte sempre!
Abraços./-